Academic year
2021-22
Is found in:
- Associate Degree of Computer Programming, programme stage 2
This is a single course unit.
Study load:
30 credits
It is not possible to enrol in this course unit under
- credit contract.
- exam contract (to obtain a credit).
- exam contract (to obtain a degree).
Teaching staff: Brandt Rik, Charleer Sven, Coenen Christel, De Brabandere Ann, Inghelbrecht Denis, Lettany Barbara, Maes Sven, Similon Andie, Spaas Peter, Sturm Dimitri, Van Camp Vincent, Van den Poel Jan, Van de Velde Chris, Van Loo Erwin, Verhulst David
Teaching staff are not (all) known yet.
Languages: Dutch
Scheduled for: Semester 1 or Semester 2 or Academic year
This course unit is marked out of 20 (rounded to an integer).
Re-sit exam: not possible.
Possibility of tolerance: You have to pass this course unit (will never be tolerated).
Total study time: 780,00 hours
Learning outcomes (list)
| The student works out a technical design based on the delivered functional analysis and based on a presupposed methodology. |
| The student considers different solutions in consultation with the team and the client. |
| The student uses the proper tools to contribute to the deployment process by which their code can be delivered. |
| The student assesses and discusses with the person involved whether as a result of test results the necessary adaptations have to be carried out. |
| The student interprets test results and starts, based on this, the necessary actions to solve errors or improve the functioning attuned to the situation at the place of work. |
| The student evaluates the good functioning of the (part) application by executing the appropriate tests. |
| The student works out a project both independently and in a multidisciplinary team. |
| The student constructively and proactively works in a team within a professional company context (collaboration tools, communication channels). |
| The student keeps to the presupposed deadlines and keeps team members up to date on changes. |
| The student sets up an attainable and well-founded planning for their own work using the planning method typical for the organisation and sticks to the presupposed deadlines. |
| The student systematically delivers detailed documentation with regard to their own applications. |
| The student handles a methodology for the application of deontological rules which are enforced by the government and the company. |
| The student lists the functional requirements for an integrated project. |
| The student sets up an attainable and well-founded planning for their own work using the planning method typical for the organisation and sticks to the presupposed deadlines. |
| The student works according to a set project methodology typical for the workplace. |
| The student realizes a project based on their own design and a given analysis with limited support at the workplace. |
| The student develops a (part) application with sufficient attention for re-usability and efficiency. |
| The student has an eye for safety in the application according to the regulations and demands. |
| The student realizes a project in a consistent way according to standards and agreements within the organisation. |
| The student adapts an existing application in consideration of improvement or extension. |
| The student lists new or adapted needs and errors. |
| The student uses both orally and in written the proper language and the appropriate technical jargon. |
| The student reports and communicates on the delivered work adapted to the target public in a new situation. |
| The student efficiently and effectively communicates both orally and in written within a professional context. |
| The student assesses relevant new ICT-techniques and technology according to their usefulness. |
| The student takes initiative for the mastering of relevant and new skills. |
| The student indicates their own development needs. |
| The student reflects on the execution of the project and their attitude in the professional context. |
Educational organisation (list)
Evaluation (list)
Evaluation(s) for both exam chances, not reproducible in re-sit exam
| Moment | Form | % | Remark |
| Academic year | Internship | 70,00 | Geen tweede examenkans mogelijk voor dit deelexamen. |
| Academic year | Portfolio | 30,00 | Documenteren, rapporteren en reflecteren. Geen tweede examenkans mogelijk voor dit deelexamen. |